On the insanity of U.S. anti-business attitudes

Terry Traub
revised May 9, 2002

Despite its many flaws, the U.S. is still the planet's most open minded place to do business. However, the flight of factories and other businesses to other countries cannot be explained merely by the higher cost of labor.

The New York Times reported recently that Stanley Works, renowned toolmaker, is proposing to move its nominal headquarters offshore to Bermuda in order to save $30 million a year in taxes. In typical old-line Democratic fashion, the NYT focuses on the trepidations of the remaining workers in New Britain, Conn. We'll eventually be let go, they moan; Stanley will build new factories in Mexico and China where costs are much lower. They're right, of course; as long as Stanley keeps its profits out of the U.S., it can build new factories!

What a sad state of affairs; a company tries to lower its costs and maximize profits. Isn't capitalism terrible? Well, I'm being a bit sarcastic, but consider the alternatives; Stanley is fighting for survival against large rivals with a much lower cost basis. The workers complain that their union rates of $10-20/hour can't compete with overseas rates. While these rates are not like the ridiculous and undeserved auto and steel pay scales (two low quality, underperforming sectors which are essentially a form of corporate and blue collar make-work welfare), it is objectionable that companies must pay corporate income tax when their employees all pay personal income tax already. It is a form of double taxation and has helped fuel the exodus of most industries to tax free havens such as Singapore and the export zones of Mexico, China, and Taiwan.

The most disturbing fact is that a large swath of people on the left and center of American politics see nothing wrong with taxing corporations; it's a way to fund new public works without making the taxpayers feel the pain directly. People who make, say, $30,000 a year are too stupid and ill informed to realize that they might be earning more money if their employers had more money. More importantly, their jobs might be more secure if their employers had one less reason to relocate offshore.

GW Bush's family is mocked by people on the left for having made their fortune in the oil business. As though something's rotten about that. The left generally likes the Clintons despite their sleaziness; it's somehow more respectable to be lawyers and career politicians than successful capitalists.

In China, a factory owner basically hires a bunch of people and goes for it. He only has to worry about toeing the Communist political line. They have little political freedom but they do recognize the value of jobs.

In the U.S. a factory owner has to deal with:
- maternity leave
- paternity leave
- small necessities leave (24 hours/year in Massachusetts)
- politically correct workplace (e.g., multi-ethnic staff)
- impossibly safe workplace--the slightest injury, e.g. carpal tunnel or back aches, can result in massive, punitive lawsuits presided over by a left-leaning judiciary
- extremely high cost of liability insurance because of the above
- total prevention of sexual harassment--the slightest innuendo can result in massive, punitive lawsuits as above.
- union rules preventing flexibility of work roles
- union rules preventing firing of lazy workers
- union rules preventing introduction of new technology that might "endanger" jobs.
- union rules mandating artificially inflated wages
- union rules preventing promotion of competent workers and demotion of incompetents.
- union rules preventing hiring of workers by management
- high property taxes levied by communities to fund social agendas that the public won't support through direct taxation
- double taxation through corporate income tax plus personal income tax
- punishing successful investments with the "capital gains tax"
- widely held view in the schools and universities that capitalism is bad and socialism is good, even after the failure of every socialist system in the world
- crime--encouraged by widespread permissive attitudes and moral relativism promulgated in the schools and universities and by a reluctance to hold people accountable for their actions

Home